The genesis of this picture is somewhat complicated. Meanwhile, one of several, and if at first thought that came to be the only well enough then I realized that it is not.
I've always been very affected by those shots of moving objects (lighthouses, but not only) in the dark. Obviously the ideal would be a tripod. There is no doubt that not only I did not do well not to use it, not take it so ... undoubt but I'll buy it. There is no comparison.
This photo I shot putting the camera on the dashboard. It was not so dark, but I put ISO 200 and I gave the car the more time it could be argued (usually by giving priority to the shutter time).
As a result I got:
- Diverse foto brutte o comunque mosse perché ha macchina è scivolata o l'ho sfiorata mentre scattava o entrambe le cose.
- Due o tre foto in cui i lampioni "stanno fermi" e i fari delle macchine sono le uniche cose che si muovono. Sono contenta perché ne ho uno rosso (questa) e uno bianco... pareggio, insomma.
Mi riservo però di tornare sul soggetto, perché voglio riprovare con un cavalletto. Non è stata però questa foto a farmi decidere che, anche se purtroppo la cosa non sarà comodissima perché i treppiedi non li vendono con somaro incluso, mi prenderò a breve un cavalletto.
E' stata una foto dell'albero di Natale, che fra parentesi devo ancora scaricare... ho fatto uno scatto al minimale tree in my parents' house with the lights on, putting the machine with very long shutter speed and ISO 200. Of course there are the Christmas parcels: I stacked a bit 'and I've placed above the machine. Then I saw the result on the screen and I started thinking that maybe, especially if I plan to take pictures at night as fireworks and various capers, the stand is not what hurt. More
that the cost was to bring the weight that bothered me ... But in fact you could not do things wrong with a tripod. The stand has no heartbeat (as hands), convexity is not provided (such as walls) or other similar effects.